CASINO ANSWER MAN by John Grochowski John Grochowski is a blackjack expert and a well-known and respected casino gambling columnist. His syndicated casino gambling column appears in the Denver Post, Casino City Times, and other newspapers and web sites. Grochowski has written six books on gambling including the "Answer Man" series of books (www.casinoanswerman.com). He offers one-minute gambling tips on radio station WLS-AM (890) and podcasts are available at http://www.wlsam.com/sectional.asp?id=38069. Send your question to Grochowski at casinoanswerman@casinoanswerman.com.Q. I've been surprised at the staying power of 21 + 3. Blackjack side bets come and go, but that one's lasted for years. Do you have any thoughts on why that one and not Royal Match or Over/Under 13, for instance?A. Blackjack side bets do usually have short shelf lives, as you note. Usually, that’s because they have very high house edges. The appeal of larger payoffs than you get on the base game wears thin when you lose hand after hand after hand.Sometimes the appeal is strong enough that the side bet has a second life, and a third and even a fourth. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve seen Royal Match come back, including in electronic versions from Shuffle Master, which became SHFL Entertainment, and which is now part of Bally Technologies. The most common version, used on six-deck games and paying 2.5-1 on any two suited cards and 25-1 for a King and Queen of the same suit, has a house edge of 6.67 percent. About 75 percent of hands are non-winners, and the royal matches come up only about once per 337 hands. Given enough playing time, that’s not enough positive reinforcement to overcome the constant drain on the bankroll, so after casinos use it for a while, it goes on the backburner. Over/Under 13 also has a high house edge at 6.6 percent if you bet the over, 10.1 percent if you bet the under, and 8.6 percent if you bet the first two cards will total 13. Again, there’s a constant bankroll drain. There’s also a complicating factor: Over/Under 13 can be counted, and in the 1990s there were players who, depending on the count, were skipping the blackjack bet and just playing the side bet. Casinos had to amend rules to prevent that. So you had players being turned off by a bankroll drain and operators being turned off by advantage play. Today, 21 + 3 seems to have hit a sweet spot. Not every player makes the side bet – in fact, the majority don’t. Those who play get a 9-1 payoff if there’s a pair or better in the player’s first two cards plus the dealer’s up card. The house edge of 3.2 percent is lower than that on most other side bets, and not all that different from the edge hunch players face on the base game – especially if the base game is paying 6-5 on blackjacks. If I were designing a side bet, that’s what I’d aim for – payoffs high enough to attract initial play, and a house edge close enough to the edge against average blackjack players that they don’t notice the difference..
Q. Playing my usual Double Double Bonus machines, I was dealt three 4s. Of course, I didn’t get the other 4. On the very next round, I was dealt three 4s again. And again I didn’t get the other 4. Imagine my shock when I’m dealt another three 4s – and of course I didn’t get the other 4. I know about the RNGs , but what are the odds of getting nine 4s in three consecutive rounds. What do you think about this scenario?A. There are 2,598,960 possible hands, in which card order doesn’t matter. Of those, 54,912 are three of a kind. And because there are 13 card denominations, one of every 13 three of a kinds are three 4s, leaving 4,224 possible three-4 hands. Divide all possible hands by the number of hands that include three 4s, and you get 615. Your chances of being dealt three 4s on any one hand are 1 in 615. Q. Everything I've read says that in games that pay 800 or more on four Aces, you should break up an Aces –up full house to hold the Aces alone. Is that true in all of those games? How close a call is it?A. The closeness of the call depends on a couple of things: How much do full houses pay, and is there an extra jackpot if you draw a designated kicker to go with the Aces?In 10-7-5 Double Bonus Poker, where full houses pay 10-for-1, your average return for a five-coin bet is 50.57 coins if you hold three Aces, compared to a flat 50-coin payoff if you hold the full house. If you drop to a 9-6-5 or 9-6-4 pay table – all too common nowadays – the average return for holding three Aces dips slightly to 50.26 coins, but the reward for standing pat drops to 45 coins. This no longer is in the realm of close calls. Make the game 9-6 Double Double Bonus, and the 2,000-coin bonanza for four Aces plus a low kicker takes the average return when holding Ace-Ace-Ace to 63.58 coins, and that towers over the 45-coin full house return. In a non-kicker game with a high full house return such as 10-7-5 Double Bonus, it ca be a close call, but in games with big payoffs for four Aces with a kicker, breaking up the Aces-up full house is a no brainer.
|
©2015, DeepNet Technologies. No material to be copied without express permission of DeepNet Technologies. |